lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jm <jmugur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: speed of CheckIndex
Date Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:59:33 GMT
mostly status of the indexes, whether there is some corruption or all is ok.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:

> what kind of diagnostics are you looking for?
>
> simon
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:14 PM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Erick, but I guess what you refer to lives in Solr right? I am
> using
> > plain Lucene.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> What information do you need? Could you just ping the stats component
> >> and parse the results (basically the info on the admin/stats page).
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Erick
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I need to collect some diagnostic info from customer sites, so I would
> >> like
> >> > to get info on the status of lucene indexes...but I don't want the
> >> process
> >> > of collecting to take very long.
> >> >
> >> > So I am considering Checkindex. I tested in a small index (60k docs)
> and
> >> it
> >> > took 12 seconds. A site usually has up to 100 indexes (indexes have 6
> >> > fields) so running it for every index like this is unfeasible.
> >> >
> >> > Is there a way to make is faster (even if it verifies less things?).
> Is
> >> the
> >> > time Checkindex will take proportional to number of docs? I am on
> Lucene
> >> > 3.1
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message