lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu>
Subject RE: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information
Date Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:23:40 GMT
Thanks Dawid. – Steve

From: dawid.weiss@gmail.com [mailto:dawid.weiss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dawid Weiss
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 4:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Steven A Rowe
Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information


This is the e-mail you're looking for, Steven (it wasn't forwarded to the list, apparently).

Dawid
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Taylor <paul_t100@fastmail.fm<mailto:paul_t100@fastmail.fm>>
Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information
To: Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com<mailto:dawid.weiss@gmail.com>>

On 29/04/2011 15:17, Dawid Weiss wrote:

> lucene/Search that is taking the time, I also had another attempt using luke
> but find it incredibly buggy and of little use

Can you expand on this too? What kind of "incredible bugs" did you see? Without feedback there
is little progress, so bug reports count.

Dawid
Sorry, I'll withdraw that. I was getting all kinds of stacktraces and exceptions when I tried
to do searches but the problem was my fault. Because I wanted to use my own analyzer  I had
a shells script that added it to the classpath when I ran luke, however I had put it before
the ant jar and my jar built with maven also included lucene 3.0.3 and because luke 1.0.1
is packaged with 3.0.0 it was confusing it, but I didnt realize this until I notice done exception
complained a lucene method was missing.

But having got it working I cannot see anything to help me work out why the queries are taking
too long, is it useful for this or just for refining your queries ?

Paul

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message