Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65602 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 02:05:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 02:05:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 70779 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 02:05:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70706 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 02:05:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 70698 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 02:05:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:05:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of shrinath.m@webyog.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:04:54 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzg6C-0006yO-He for java-user@lucene.apache.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:04:32 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:04:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "shrinath.m" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <4d801aa4.d4aae60a.5b61.19b0@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1300185984444-2681163.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: RE:Re: How to do an all field search without using a "catchall" fieldor "MultiFieldQueryParser" ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_12940_27278778.1300241072541" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_12940_27278778.1300241072541 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Ian, I'd have to create a similarly sized array of Boolean.Occur too, isn't it? 1. Is that how SIREn implements it? 2. Is that optimal solution if I'm going to have an index of a billion docs with varying number of fields? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-do-an-all-field-search-without-using-a-catchall-field-or-MultiFieldQueryParser-tp2681163p2685072.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------=_Part_12940_27278778.1300241072541--