lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: IndexSearcher Single Instance Bottleneck?
Date Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:26:09 GMT
No, Lucene itself shouldn't be doing this, the recommendation is for multiple
threads to share a single searcher. I'd first look upstream, are your requests
being processed serially? I.e. is there a single thread that's
handling requests?

Best
Erick

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:25 PM, RobM <rmcclanahan@databanq.com> wrote:
> I currently have two types of searches on my website that are using the same
> index and same instance of index searcher. One of the searches usually only
> takes 50 - 100 milliseconds but the second usually takes 2 seconds. It seems
> as though when someone does the second search and another user does the
> first search immediately after the first search will wait for the second to
> complete. Is that how Lucene works or am I just looking at my test wrong. If
> so how should i solve this issue? Two indexes or two index searchers?
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/IndexSearcher-Single-Instance-Bottleneck-tp2662376p2662376.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message