Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32368 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2011 22:24:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2011 22:24:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 40174 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2011 22:24:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40108 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2011 22:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40100 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2011 22:24:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:24:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:24:10 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2252279bwz.35 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:23:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=lKcQDioyHmc6WC1N9Sr14T5HIAg7FNMrlL1w/OS01MY=; b=rmvjXGqLWfUJjWdKqfSvEBOxoCIWMYAuf/h9BpdIhsr3Aq30Ax6wFs8eHtkCah6tGO S7l84aVxR17zqPKFFGtDps7LmWXJq+TrOEBssjdjejFB3eWVbwCDYbB8VRAY/KXM1dfx KOCvOPi3RtS47Dnxyrjgz1h+G2hMTxLgR267s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=G/CtLhpOaT9nuGYS4OhY25/hXsJT3FoEb1NullM3YpVGORLhQrDWH0FQ6rsnnkHHps uiFE1WEyqN+n3FMlSuiRbHQuPJl4py+2GZrUwYT/plyIHpEfAE8mF7u/+Wzn1IVlI2GQ Ai86+tsvkKD2gcEfoxRjZCL29bwLMfC1lrFwc= Received: by 10.204.34.142 with SMTP id l14mr2258236bkd.152.1296771828485; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:23:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.101.5 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:23:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Muir Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:23:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using different field when overriding computeNorm To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Ryan Aylward wrote: > This is great. Is there a target of when 4.0 will be released? > Unfortunately I think its quite a ways away: there are branches for major features such as per-document payloads, realtime search, modern index compression algorithms, and a variety of other exciting things in the works. As far as releases go, currently we are working towards release 3.1, which is the next stable minor release upgrade from 3.0. It might be technically possible to backport this feature (per-field similarity) to the 3.x codebase while still keeping backwards compatibility, but I'm worried about breaking backwards compatibility in subtle ways due to some gremlins in the code... we fixed most of these gremlins in trunk but they are still available and deprecated in 3.1 (example: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2828). So, at the moment having this feature be something that has to wait until 4.0 is the safest option in my opinion... but I feel your pain here when trying to customize the scoring system... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org