Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87749 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 12:09:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 12:09:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1559 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 12:09:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1190 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 12:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1177 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 12:09:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:09:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:09:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 87680 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 12:08:31 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [10.0.0.77]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username gsingers, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:08:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Lucene index exchange format? From: Grant Ingersoll In-Reply-To: <7AAF0F73-3FF9-48D6-94B7-124B4AD82129@activemath.org> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:08:58 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <7AAF0F73-3FF9-48D6-94B7-124B4AD82129@activemath.org> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) You can do this in trunk right now using the Codec capability. In fact, = there is a text version already, but it is likely to be really slow on = anything significant. You could likely produce something that is faster = but still readable. On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:46 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > hello list, >=20 > more and more I seem to encounter situations where the delivery of a = prebuilt lucene index is desirable. >=20 > The binary format probably works (experience hints would be welcome) = but I fear it would be fragile with versioning (it certainly fails at = version-downgrading). >=20 > Did anyone work on a lucene import-export format? Something like XML = that would load fairly fast provided I/O goes fast? >=20 > thanks in advance >=20 > paul > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org >=20 -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org