Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=BruVkj23b7jMhyzY+kXuv7wuQ/BlZJWnMWCwix7eRcJI+60YIuq/I/emoU3mpERoGesslRwuUevDJVuP7X8gzi2RZtIc5amNa6bLxy7jPZ0gu3spBdNamG28R2NnIQLCZ4am1FsNmBHecjsh/uAn9C0o7ybrTVKC2sYWAxjzCY0=;
Message-ID: <898709.38710.qm@web50306.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: 
 <3B4AEBB59588ED409ECE3CB6517C417510C036EB23@exchange.windows.mmu.acquiremedia.com>
 <AANLkTinOMdNtshh6W6_netz+oX8=FBNiXPxVos4mvC_h@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: How about lucene's delete performance ?
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinOMdNtshh6W6_netz+oX8=FBNiXPxVos4mvC_h@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hello,

Of course, if you actually want the last 7 days rolling effect and not the this 
week vs. previous week, then you could go with smaller indices, say daily ones.
Then you'd always add new docs to the latest index and removing the oldest index 
completely every 24 hours.

You could go hourly, too, depending on your exact needs.

Otis
----
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/


----- Original Message ----
> From: Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, October 13, 2010 11:06:46 AM
> Subject: Re: How about lucene's delete performance ?
> 
> Note that deleteAll does not require you to optimize anything. It  literally
> removes all segments from the index in one shot, and when the files  are
> unreferenced, they will be removed entirely.
> 
> Shai
> 
> On Wed,  Oct 13, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dan OConnor 
<doconnor@acquiremedia.com>wrote:
> 
> >  Jeff,
> > I would suggest not deleting documents off the back of the index  unless you
> > can optimize your index regularly. (Depending on your volume,  this could be
> > every day or once a week)
> >
> > I would suggest  having two indexes, one that is "this" week and one that is
> > "last" week  and a multi-index searcher that is aware of the date. When you
> > get to  the end of "this" week, you would delete "last" week's index and
> > create  a new "next" week index.
> >
> > Regards
> >  Dan
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jeff  Zhang <zjffdu@gmail.com>
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
> >  Sent: Wed Oct 13 09:37:31 2010
> > Subject: How about lucene's delete  performance ?
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I only want to index the  latest one week's data, the previous data can
> > be deleted. So I'd like to  know about lucene's delete performance and
> > whether it will has impact on  the search performance when I do lots of
> > delete operation in the  meantime.  Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> >
> >  Jeff Zhang
> >
> >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To  unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org