lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Janssen <>
Subject Re: recommended way to identify a version to pass to StandardAnalyzer constructor?
Date Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:14:48 GMT
Simon Willnauer <> wrote:

> Hey Bill,
> let me clarify what Version is used for since I think that caused
> little confusion.


> The Version constant was mainly introduced to help
> users with backwards compatibility and upgrading their codebase to a
> new version of lucene without breaking existing applications / indexes
> build with previous versions. For instance StandardAnalyzer preserves
> the positionIncrement in its StopFilter which was introduces in Lucene
> 2.9. If you use 2.4 and upgrade to 2.9 this change might break you app
> since you indexed with a 2.4 behavior. You phrasequeries might not
> work as expected anymore. If you don't have any upgrade issues or if
> you can simply reindex you might just use the latest version.

That's what I'm trying to do.  But how?  LUCENE_CURRENT is deprecated!

How about adding a constructor for StandardAnalyzer that takes no
parameters and is implicitly LUCENE_CURRENT?

> Some usecases might require somewhat "buggy" behavior which has been
> fixed in various places in lucene but must be maintained because of
> backwards compatibility this is also done by Version.


> If a certain
> class like IndexWriter / IndexReader have maintained compatibility
> without a Version constant so there is no need to pass it to them. You
> will be implicitly on the latest version.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message