Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91782 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 19:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 19:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 376 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 19:22:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 215 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 19:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 207 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 19:22:07 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:22:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akaris@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:21:44 +0000 Received: by ywg4 with SMTP id 4so3175414ywg.35 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:21:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=I2E9eAVSAPsO4NTq0ER1QSLx0IXs45WYYkzVnEycJwE=; b=Mi41Z0ir2Zclu58xo5WOLHr8M9Sp78BetiQrHD6FC/b69V0qN1ExQDsCWx58wqKHAw vptIs9B/acDNUotnyUACFWRgXEYNBZcOwL8TI7VwdHw5BdGIDFF2ZLS59kbWESlDUo1H X3n0De18nQKtbHt2XmbnrwJFVbBVxPbjB0o00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=B07kEbDl6NAOd2mo4U2VlOPZ8XJZNmJ4i0PadY38hklocqfJglJyGxw+ml+p990V+n 0UrXoATFnPlq/CVJ4ik6PqNjvLqDEObvVVKWxf4uMBGe4bV3icks/R5+l2XSFMfNyLq5 C3uGsHcxi54YIT6pWY7DlzPikQ8WKWQkGtTyo= Received: by 10.213.19.211 with SMTP id c19mr4336848ebb.93.1282591282172; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:21:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.10.153 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:21:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Michel Nadeau Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:21:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Lucandra - Any experiences? To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Mike Peters Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c45f4c4123d048e828da8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c45f4c4123d048e828da8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, we are currently considering to switch from Lucene + Cassandra to *Lucandra*, mainly for the following reasons: * Ability to have many threads writing in the same index at the same time; * Live results without the need to close/re-open the index reader; * Easy scaling to many nodes thanks to Cassandra's scaling abilities; * Possibility to boost Lucene's sorting abilities by using many Cassandra ColumnFamilies; * No mismatch between data in Lucene and Cassandra (when used separately). We were told that Lucandra is ready to be used in a production system and that we would have access to all the Lucene features we're currently using (wildcard searches, ranges, pagination, sort, filters); but we couldn't find any big success stories about Lucandra - that's why I'm writing here today! So if you or someone you know worked on a project using Lucandra (especially systems involving a lot of data because we have millions and millions and millions of documents to deal with), please let me know: I'm very interested to get feedback about your experiences. Thanks, Mike --0015174c45f4c4123d048e828da8--