lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: Search on top x results
Date Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:57:06 GMT
Both must be "must", else it makes no sense.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: liat oren [mailto:oren.liat@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:53 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Search on top x results
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> So the best thing to do is to add the first boolean query as a MUST, and
the
> second query as a should?
> Even if both of them query the same fields?
> Will it actually be faster?
> 
> 
> On 6 July 2010 11:35, Ian Lea <ian.lea@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-
> java/LuceneFAQ#Can_Lucene_do_a_.22search
> >
> _within_search.22.2C_so_that_the_second_search_is_constrained_by_the
> _r
> > esults_of_the_first_query.3F
> >
> > --
> > Ian.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, liat oren <oren.liat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is it possible to run a search over top 100,000 (for example)
> > > results of
> > a
> > > prior search.
> > > So if the user first does the search, gets results, if pressing on
> > > the search button again, I would like it to run on the top 100,000
results.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Liat
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message