Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66803 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2010 21:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 21:08:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 64677 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 21:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64624 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 21:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64616 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2010 21:08:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:08:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jmuguruza@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:08:02 +0000 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so685937fxm.35 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mczamSqUZsCMsmm1Df3BlbnkhKiAsHQAS148RQ7P4YQ=; b=i8Nl0CmdWxE6f1MgMwgoSZxU450mDlZfFqo99C6O9RFptJM0InkTwd3FsmR46LHdKc ozajbDu8UF5M2GAkOk8iWDQ4FaP8w7D7G7dM7KyuXOrpFJtoGjCIqKO0wE6KjV1gosVq /hpNHhbwPBsyFIq/gp+P+BTwVMbbpeEKJeFtc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ep7U3Kwk0GekaG6IHDZDGWd8K7JieJrlA3fuDet+NTH6QL5MjdPTrZS8GsGvEz8aEX 7XFT36IbpZGMBwCqAT0I/48m0LILodqqdmYkHxTQKsjpM6aTLrr9sbqm/cvTmrqAmvJ4 ZpQJqgX03dZGDz2kBzVmdJr8i37QneDCe234A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.98.83 with SMTP id p19mr8292288fan.27.1277327261731; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.107.193 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:07:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <146692.68973.qm@web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <146692.68973.qm@web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:07:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition From: jm To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org thanks guys, those links are cool. I welcome any other positive thing anyone can add. Specially references of products/sites moving to lucene/solr javier On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Lucene/Solr choice typically means: > > * lower cost of ownership (think about various crazy licensing models som= e of the commercial search vendors have: per doc, per server, per query, pe= r year....) > > * faster implementation (just think about the duration of the sales/negot= iation phase for commercial search vendors) > > * flexibility -- it's open source, you can change whatever you want. =A0T= ry that with closed-source commercial search vendor's package. > > * super fast and knowledgeable community =A0-- see http://www.jroller.com= /otis/entry/lucene_solr_nutch_amazing_tech > > * commercial support and experts still available -- see http://www.semate= xt.com/services/index.html > > * adoption - small companies, medium companies, HUGE companies, secret or= ganizations, everyone's using some form of Lucene -- see http://wiki.apache= .org/lucene-java/PoweredBy , http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers > > * maturity - Lucene is over 10 years old. =A0Solr is over 4 years old. > > * future - look at JIRA, look at mailing list traffic, look at pace of de= velopment, look at CHANGES.txt > > * searchable documentation and mailing list archives =A0-- http://search-= lucene.com/ > > > * ... > > Otis > ---- > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: jm >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 4:01:05 AM >> Subject: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition >> >> Hi, > > I am trying to compile some arguments in favour of lucene >> as > management is deciding weather to standardize on lucene or a >> competing > commercial product (we have a couple of produc, one using >> lucene, > another using commercial product, imagine what am i using). I >> searched > the lists but could not find any post, although I remember seeing >> such > posts in the past. > > Does somebody kept such posts linked or >> something? Or does someone > know of some page that would help me? > > I >> would like to show: > - traction of lucene, really improving a lot last couple >> of years > - rich ecosystem (solr...) > - references of other companies >> choosing lucene/solr over commercial > (be it Fast or >> whatever) > > thanks > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To >> unsubscribe, e-mail: >> href=3D"mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org">java-user-unsubs= cribe@lucene.apache.org > For >> additional commands, e-mail: >> ymailto=3D"mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org" >> href=3D"mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org">java-user-help@lucene.a= pache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org