Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43419 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 12:28:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 12:28:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 4751 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 12:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4702 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 12:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4677 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 12:28:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:28:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,T_FRT_ADULT2 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of SGreene@metalseconomics.com designates 142.176.9.241 as permitted sender) Received: from [142.176.9.241] (HELO mail.metalseconomics.com) (142.176.9.241) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:28:22 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Term offsets for highlighting Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:42 -0300 Message-ID: In-reply-to: <4BCB0C1D.8060603@r.email.ne.jp> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Term offsets for highlighting Thread-Index: Acre/Pjc8k9ZE2gtS+2D979eDhtU0gAvgU5w References: <4BC90565.2080407@r.email.ne.jp> <4BCB0C1D.8060603@r.email.ne.jp> From: "Stephen Greene" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Koji, An additional question. Is it possible to access the FieldTermStack from the FastVectorHighlighter after the it has been populated with matching terms from the field? I think this would provide an ideal solution for this problem, as ultimately I am only concerned with returning positional offsets to have highlighting tags applied to them in a separate process.=20 Thank you for your insight, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:koji@r.email.ne.jp]=20 Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:42 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Term offsets for highlighting Stephen Greene wrote: > Hi Koji, > > Thank you for your reply. I did try the QueryScorer without success, but > I was using Lucene 2.4.x=20 > =20 Hi Steve, I thought you were using 2.9 or later because you mentioned FastVectorHighlighter in your previous mail (FVH was first introduced in 2.9). If I remember it correctly, 2.4's QueryScorer doesn't recognize phrase, but SpanScorer does. > I noticed in the upgrade documentation that some changes had been made > relative to QueryScorer and QueryTermScorer in 3.1. I thought I would > check if someone else had come up with a solution for returning term > offsets before I set out to refactor the existing code. Do you have any > insight as to whether the fast vector highlighter would offer any > benefits in this area over the highlighter package? > > =20 I'm not sure FVH offers benefit for you, but yes, FVH can recognize phrase and highlight terms per phrase. Koji --=20 http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org