Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87664 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 22:10:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 22:10:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 75180 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:10:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75132 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75124 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 22:10:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:10:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.25.71.29] (HELO mail.troja.net) (85.25.71.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:09:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20605D36009 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:09:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.troja.net Received: from mail.troja.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (megaira.troja.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUb9M1M6VLVp for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:09:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from VEGA (port-83-236-62-54.dynamic.qsc.de [83.236.62.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1249D36005 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:09:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "Uwe Schindler" To: References: <002052E02A48964A8035D9B6E8A1647D010C8875@0015-its-exmb01.us.saic.com> In-Reply-To: <002052E02A48964A8035D9B6E8A1647D010C8875@0015-its-exmb01.us.saic.com> Subject: RE: NumericRangeQuery in BooleanQuery Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:09:28 +0200 Message-ID: <01b101caddb1$7bff9de0$73fed9a0$@de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: AcrdkBa+5dRvdK7CQPSyuq8Jh50ngQAISjgQ Content-Language: de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thats not true, do you build the NumericRangeQuery in code, or do you = use QueryParser. The latter is not able to produce NRQ without = customizing! Else numeric RangeQueries are no magically converted they stay and are = rewritten to CustomSCoreQueries. ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Murdoch, Paul [mailto:PAUL.B.MURDOCH@saic.com] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 8:11 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: NumericRangeQuery in BooleanQuery >=20 > Hi, >=20 >=20 >=20 > Can a NumericRangeQuery be one of several Queries inside a complex > BooleanQuery? When I do this my NumericRangeQuery seems to > automagically be converted to a TermRangeQuery. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 >=20 > Paul >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org