lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: Lucene 3.0 Search Performance Stats
Date Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:26:57 GMT
Very nice!  Thanks for sharing :)

Mike

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Jamie <jamie@stimulussoft.com> wrote:
> I forgot to point out, this is a search using the Lucene realtime search
> feature. We get the reader from indexwriter.getReader() for each search.
>
> On 2010/03/19 01:49 PM, Jamie wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> I just wanted to congratulate the Lucene guys for a fine job on 3.0!!
>>
>> Since we switched our indexes to using integer based range queries based
>> on Date (YYMMHHSS), search speed is lightening fast and memory consumption
>> has dropped considerably!
>>
>> Some stats:
>>
>> Indexed Docs: 7.2M emails
>> Index Size: 24 GB (non optimized)
>> Search Speed: 0.06 - 0.09 seconds (with sort YYMMHHSS date)
>>
>> Index stored on 4 SAS HDD hitachi RAID 10
>> 16G RAM
>> 2x Xeon 4 core 2.4Gz
>> OS FreeBSD 7.2
>> Filesystem UFS2 gjournal
>>
>> I believe we are using all search performance recommendations now.
>>
>> Good job!
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message