Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <27434651.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 03:01:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Suraj Parida <parida.suraj@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching compressed text using CompressionTools
In-Reply-To: <27434620.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <27402945.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <001d01caa334$2bae98d0$830bca70$@de> <27403169.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <8c4e68611002010417pd7a6d36wb976c61c7bb176f3@mail.gmail.com>
 <27434620.post@talk.nabble.com>


Ian,

Small correction made ...

Thanks for solving my previous problems.


Now i tested the compression with 100 docs and found:
  1. Without Compression size of FS directory (on disk)= 10.8 KB
  2. With Compression size of FS directory (on disk) = 12.0 MB

and with 500 docs:
  1. Without Compression size of FS directory (on disk) = 45.9 KB
  2. With Compression size of FS directory (on disk)  = 56.8 MB

I mean do the compression will increase my disk usage ? if so will 50,000
docs take around 6000 MB?
or please tell if am i doing wrong somewhere because i thought compression
will reduce space usage.

Regards,
Suraj 
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Searching-compressed-text-using-CompressionTools-tp27402945p27434651.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org