lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jm <jmugur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: questions on upgrading to 3.0: Version.LUCENE_* and Field.setOmitNorms()
Date Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:22:30 GMT
someone?

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, jm <jmuguruza@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> previously I was using 2.9 (upgraded from 2.4 but did not fix warnings
> etc). Now I have upgraded to 3.0, so I had to fix all deprecated
> methods etc. My question is with Version type parameter in some
> Token* classes.
>
> Some of our customers have our product with lucene 2.4 (some upgraded
> from 2.3), and some have a newer version with lucene 2.9 (with
> warnings etc). What Version value should I use now? The smallest say
> Version.LUCENE_23 ? Any concern when they upgrade to the next of our
> version with lucene 3.0?
>
> Also I was using Field.Index.TOKENIZED and Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED,
> but all fields had field.setOmitNorms(true);
> Now I see there is Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, I guess I can
> just use Field.Index.ANALYZED/Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED and continue
> calling field.setOmitNorms(true) on all fields right?
>
> many thanks
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message