Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 simon.willnauer@googlemail.com designates 209.85.220.210 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=XGOaXckWHsaslan2JwW5f1aZ4yxw/qmTbsjfeF5VO0xe5OCwRViXWXRu0NOBukY2P3
         0tb51e0DRieKSbMudxeWKt+sgiRaVeFFlPB0//gTWJWPkw/bojrqsPcIoXgTJ3wFJFhv
         bbSPvPHTKxCVSVmYGSXR/uv8BO/jgkC5HkkCY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: simon.willnauer@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <0523297188849D479C16D5657F665769BB5CED486A@solute-exc2k7.solute.ka>
References: 
 <0523297188849D479C16D5657F665769BB5CED486A@solute-exc2k7.solute.ka>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:35:40 +0100
Message-ID: <f18c9dde1001070835x4122aa84r16d8eca3da06e6fd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 and 3.0: Optimized index is thrice as large as the not
	optimized index
From: Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@googlemail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Do you have a reader open on the index which was opened before your
your index was optimized? Maybe there is a reader around holding on
the references to the merged segments.

simon

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Yuliya Palchaninava <yp@solute.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the api documentation: "In general, once the optimize comple=
tes, the total size of the index will be less than the size of the starting=
 index. It could be quite a bit smaller (if there were many pending deletes=
) or just slightly smaller". In our case the index becomes not smaller but =
larger, namely thrice as large.
>
> The not optimized index doesn't contain compressed fields, what could hav=
e caused the growth of the index due to the otimization. So we cannot expla=
in what happens.
>
> Does someone have an explanation for the index growth due to the optimiza=
tion?
>
> Thanks,
> Yuliya
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org