Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93720 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 16:58:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 16:58:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 54430 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 16:57:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54378 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 16:57:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54368 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 16:57:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:57:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.226] (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:57:55 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so224970ewy.29 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:57:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=QJWNhDa2gDz7zqF0pzNUS7oU2VoEkEJkzzbkGfyVfks=; b=qC5jHNPnIrTD1AJNToDQ+tzc6tFN6i0rzm+AWE1cu/JljNW4oRVn5ctm1gYm5YU0vq MDLdwkFVvstiBhA9C5gp3/iQmYmqTaRzOYyeQCSBDQP93fXiOk/XKEri+qnLJISvVg53 HsOR3vbMXa6oeGq1bUzceE6E9J6Du9G/K4Tcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ihOk7U92yHHVNfaHtZkeyQkoJAkGJLfKiFdcAMQJG+XMYUXYuYgX/E5YrP7iceojkJ V7nugH4WLE6XhX9Rt/E9PCinDl6foV0Bm7Z9qLx2Dd4u6OURwBzhNkVS1qnUBk8Uz+7v 8ihgFuKp5UBXBNz9PQ8wl3EOOlcad59dbPIZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.87.16 with SMTP id x16mr105426wee.106.1257872253773; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:57:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AF99832.4000908@stimulussoft.com> References: <4AF99832.4000908@stimulussoft.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:57:33 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4680a99ae76bb517 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lucene index write performance optimization From: Yonik Seeley To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Jamie Band wrote: > As an aside note, is there any way for Lucene to support simultaneous writes > to an index? The indexing process is highly parallelized... just use multiple threads to add documents to the same IndexWriter. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org