Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=B/dvhW5V3Z80J0qz3++RM8S1ZPA6RrWfbR47E579we1Evs8UACjkk0UPfj5UVt954P
         S5F54RpvppgoGwHfbnj1bqkhTLHo7jaTg5lAoILc9Gv4QTZSIICmQr67I4944P1gvqyu
         6Nd+0CIuLiMrdF5PqBPohnJ6Yqn6DTlJxVmUY=
Message-ID: <4AF8C31F.404@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:34:23 -0500
From: Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: building lucene-core from source
References: <e994873a0911091538q665e889fu108302ad81b0817d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <27A6DEF8766F49D0B7995F9B53F27A29@VEGA>
	 <e994873a0911091655o1a3913e6tcb6d718b72ab1feb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4AF8BA85.3070600@gmail.com>
	 <e994873a0911091707l3a668f88q9c9fbe3de493ef9c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4AF8BE4E.9030205@gmail.com>
 <e994873a0911091725r5cdbb8ddg55e33abba042c022@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e994873a0911091725r5cdbb8ddg55e33abba042c022@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Right - I followed the release wiki and took it out for 2.9.0 - but then
before 2.9.1 some discussion arose about not taking it out.

Peter Keegan wrote:
> I get your points (btw, I built with 1.6), and I like the easy override.
> But, my build of 2.9.0 didn't produce a dev jar, which is inconsistent with
> 2.9.1. I guess that's the flux you referred to.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Yeah - its a debatable point. You can have issues when building though -
>> did you build with java 1.5? Then its not like the official build. This
>> keeps you from confusing yourself about what artifacts are what. You can
>> override it, but this way you know what you have done. Just because you
>> have the official source, it doesn't mean you will create something
>> identical to the official jars that were released.
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter Keegan wrote:
>>     
>>> The -dev version is confusing when it's the target of a build from an
>>> official release.
>>> A build with patches from an official release might warrant a '-dev'
>>> version, I suppose.
>>> (just my 2 cents.)
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
>>>       
>> wrote:
>>     
>>>       
>>>> The build/release formula is always in flux - we likely hard coded the
>>>> change in 2.9.0 when releasing - we likely won't again in the future.
>>>> Some discussion about it came up recently on the list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> - Mark
>>>>
>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter Keegan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> OK. I just downloaded the 2.9.0 sources from
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>> http://mirror.candidhosting.com/pub/apache/lucene/java/lucene-2.9.0-src.zipto
>>     
>>>>> a clean directory. 'ant jar-core' produced:
>>>>> 'build/lucene-core-2.9.jar'
>>>>> (no -dev version suffix and I changed nothing). Are you saying that it
>>>>> should have produced 'build/lucene-core-2.9.0-dev.jar'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> If you build from sources, it automatically assumes a dev version (you
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> have changed it). If you want to override the automatically set
>>>>>>             
>> version
>>     
>>>> (as
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>> we do it during build), use "ant -Dversion=2.9.1"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Peter Keegan [mailto:peterlkeegan@gmail.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:38 AM
>>>>>>> To: java-user
>>>>>>> Subject: building lucene-core from source
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know this has been asked before, but I couldn't find the thread.
>>>>>>> The jar file produced from a build of 2.9.0 is 'lucene-core-2.9.jar'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>> For
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>>> 2.9.1, it is 'lucene-core-2.9.1-dev.jar'. When does the '-dev' get
>>>>>>> removed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org