Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31324 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 01:10:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 46282 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 01:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46207 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 01:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46197 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 01:10:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:10:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:09:58 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so581020qwd.53 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:09:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=smtgeVnPGLBLl4k8n3HTpjYI8yNW/T4I2g9ABLW9YfE=; b=Dp6gvbECe5SGYzd1kmSMF8v7EorJvf5zsfNzr7VWgbsJAuGbqvpKiosIQYaNhmzUCq 8jH3LRfSznc8Bnbc9s7WgZOUbkQbR9iYCRrfTccfyPXa8Y3U82H3i9QY49drpY+QvO4+ vYgmhjaw+Dnt87EaCaDMm3I6KGRBxlbKwXSYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Gc4sWkZBNl1eaKSJ62Ei7p87y+4Y7c8ECrBflUeVjpPI13tmjvqAGZ5bzKzdMrMP1W nque22M71mwbXZ9SQkDAddQzL3b2zHPmGtBjl5zm2DyCraU3gLsDyGYYxv99hZb+f1dZ q2yYQZavypOdwK+J16CcLkD4fPU+p1aWC52f0= Received: by 10.224.78.219 with SMTP id m27mr4522954qak.181.1257815377237; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:09:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.108? (ool-44c639d9.dyn.optonline.net [68.198.57.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm148390qyk.1.2009.11.09.17.09.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:09:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AF8BD4F.30009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:09:35 -0500 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions about SEN patch submissions References: <3504767f0911091155n3ff7b001s291f5988a820ef9c@mail.gmail.com> <8f0ad1f30911091234xd1f6249yb6b9d20c6aaeff9@mail.gmail.com> <3504767f0911091301t7bc3b82fubb920e186bc9f6ca@mail.gmail.com> <8f0ad1f30911091307s15865d01xa3b776161b9ca7bc@mail.gmail.com> <20091110000203.GA28959@rectangular.com> In-Reply-To: <20091110000203.GA28959@rectangular.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:07:55PM -0500, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Mark, I think my concern is that Sen itself is LGPL ( >> https://sen.dev.java.net/). >> >> this lucene-ja is just a lucene interface to this LGPL library. >> >> I think this dependency might be a problem, but I am not the expert: >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a >> > > I'm not an expert either, but I believe that we can distribute an Apache > licensed interface to an LGPL library, so long as we do not distribute the > library itself and so long as the interface is not a derived work. > > If the IP in the interface is entirely original, then the copyright holder for > the original library has no claim on it and can't stop the interface author > from doing whatever they want with their own material... right? > > Marvin Humphrey > Yeah, we can distribute an original interface to an LGPL lib. We have to make the user download the lib by pointing to it from a web page or doc or a non default part of our build can auto get it if we alert the user of the license of the piece thats being retrieved. I believe that the LGPL people think that its fine to include with Apache stuff whole hog, but Apache does not agree - so we have to do it that way. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org