lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Keegan <peterlkee...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: building lucene-core from source
Date Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:25:22 GMT
I get your points (btw, I built with 1.6), and I like the easy override.
But, my build of 2.9.0 didn't produce a dev jar, which is inconsistent with
2.9.1. I guess that's the flux you referred to.

Peter


On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah - its a debatable point. You can have issues when building though -
> did you build with java 1.5? Then its not like the official build. This
> keeps you from confusing yourself about what artifacts are what. You can
> override it, but this way you know what you have done. Just because you
> have the official source, it doesn't mean you will create something
> identical to the official jars that were released.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> Peter Keegan wrote:
> > The -dev version is confusing when it's the target of a build from an
> > official release.
> > A build with patches from an official release might warrant a '-dev'
> > version, I suppose.
> > (just my 2 cents.)
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The build/release formula is always in flux - we likely hard coded the
> >> change in 2.9.0 when releasing - we likely won't again in the future.
> >> Some discussion about it came up recently on the list.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> - Mark
> >>
> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter Keegan wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK. I just downloaded the 2.9.0 sources from
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://mirror.candidhosting.com/pub/apache/lucene/java/lucene-2.9.0-src.zipto
> >>
> >>> a clean directory. 'ant jar-core' produced:
> >>> 'build/lucene-core-2.9.jar'
> >>> (no -dev version suffix and I changed nothing). Are you saying that it
> >>> should have produced 'build/lucene-core-2.9.0-dev.jar'?
> >>>
> >>> Peter
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> If you build from sources, it automatically assumes a dev version (you
> >>>> could
> >>>> have changed it). If you want to override the automatically set
> version
> >>>>
> >> (as
> >>
> >>>> we do it during build), use "ant -Dversion=2.9.1"
> >>>>
> >>>> Uwe
> >>>>
> >>>> -----
> >>>> Uwe Schindler
> >>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Peter Keegan [mailto:peterlkeegan@gmail.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:38 AM
> >>>>> To: java-user
> >>>>> Subject: building lucene-core from source
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know this has been asked before, but I couldn't find the thread.
> >>>>> The jar file produced from a build of 2.9.0 is 'lucene-core-2.9.jar'.
> >>>>>
> >> For
> >>
> >>>>> 2.9.1, it is 'lucene-core-2.9.1-dev.jar'. When does the '-dev' get
> >>>>> removed?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Peter
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message