lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions about SEN patch submissions
Date Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:56:05 GMT
if he is ok with it i think we need to setup a software grant, etc

in my opinion though, this would be a great thing feature to have in lucene.
(we have similar support for chinese now, but no japanese)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Mark Bennett <mbennett@ideaeng.com> wrote:

> I'll ask the author.
>
> --
> Mark Bennett / New Idea Engineering, Inc. / mbennett@ideaeng.com
> Direct: 408-733-0387 / Main: 866-IDEA-ENG / Cell: 408-829-6513
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I think apache 2.0 would be easiest. But I think BSD also works.
> > Its a little strange Sen is LGPL when the underlying dictionaries,
> chasen,
> > mecab (what it was ported from), all BSD/bsd-like.
> > or they are multi-licensed with BSD being one of them.
> >
> > I also agree and hear you about how the glue code is broken, but in my
> > opinion if the sen + glue code could be imported into lucene
> > under one package, it would be easiest to maintain. this way it wouldn't
> > become broken again.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Mark Bennett <mbennett@ideaeng.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Robert,
> > >
> > > Thank you for helping sort through this, and for the Wiki link.
> > >
> > > A few thoughts here:
> > >
> > > 1: I think the author will change the license if I ask, he's been very
> > > supportive (though seems to be working on other things these days).
> > >
> > >    If you ran the Universe, which specific license would you like to
> see
> > > SEN converted to?
> > >    To me the BSD license is the nicest, as I perceive it as having the
> > > fewest restrictions.
> > >
> >
> > > 2: It's the glue layer that is currently broken (and under the correct
> > > license).
> > >    The revised code needs a good home.
> > >
> >
> > >    Although I'd like to eventually get core SEN in here, it is not
> > > currently broken.
> > >    The unmodified ZIP can bed downloaded as-is and used (albeit with a
> > > couple manual steps)
> > >
> > >    I guess an analogy:
> > >    I might want to use an open source JDBC driver to access a
> commercial
> > > database.
> > >    But the commercial database itself is not open source.
> > >
> > > 3: The source dictionaries are under yet another license, BUT they are
> > > downloaded by build.xml
> > >    and not shipped with either ZIP file.
> > >
> > > I'm surprised that GPL and LGPL are incompatible with these the Lucene
> > > projects.  Is there any discussion between the two camps to address
> this?
> > > Seems like we're all "on the same side".  Open Source License
> > > Incompatibility Issues, hm...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Bennett / New Idea Engineering, Inc. / mbennett@ideaeng.com
> > > Direct: 408-733-0387 / Main: 866-IDEA-ENG / Cell: 408-829-6513
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mark, I think my concern is that Sen itself is LGPL (
> > > > https://sen.dev.java.net/).
> > > >
> > > > this lucene-ja is just a lucene interface to this LGPL library.
> > > >
> > > > I think this dependency might be a problem, but I am not the expert:
> > > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mark Bennett <mbennett@ideaeng.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Robert,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Mark, has there been any change to the LGPL dependency?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Mark Bennett <
> mbennett@ideaeng.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > The only code I'm modifying at the moment is the lucene-ja section,
> > > which
> > > > > is
> > > > > the integration between core SEN and Lucene.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a sample at the top of one of the lucene-ja files.  Would
> > these
> > > > > need
> > > > > to be changed?  If so, believe the author would.
> > > > >
> > > > > /**
> > > > >  * Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation
> > > > >  *
> > > > >  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
> > > > >  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> > > > >  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > > > >  *
> > > > >  *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > >  *
> > > > >  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> > software
> > > > >  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
> BASIS,
> > > > >  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
> > > > implied.
> > > > >  * See the License for the specific language governing permissions
> > and
> > > > >  * limitations under the License.
> > > > >  */
> > > > >
> > > > > The SEN library is LGPL, though I can't find file I got that from
> at
> > > the
> > > > > moment.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Robert Muir
> > > > rcmuir@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Robert Muir
> > rcmuir@gmail.com
> >
>



-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message