lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions about SEN patch submissions
Date Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:07:55 GMT
Mark, I think my concern is that Sen itself is LGPL (
https://sen.dev.java.net/).

this lucene-ja is just a lucene interface to this LGPL library.

I think this dependency might be a problem, but I am not the expert:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a


On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mark Bennett <mbennett@ideaeng.com> wrote:

> Hello Robert,
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mark, has there been any change to the LGPL dependency?
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Mark Bennett <mbennett@ideaeng.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> The only code I'm modifying at the moment is the lucene-ja section, which
> is
> the integration between core SEN and Lucene.
>
> This is a sample at the top of one of the lucene-ja files.  Would these
> need
> to be changed?  If so, believe the author would.
>
> /**
>  * Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation
>  *
>  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
>  *
>  *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>  *
>  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>  * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>  * limitations under the License.
>  */
>
> The SEN library is LGPL, though I can't find file I got that from at the
> moment.
>



-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message