lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <>
Subject Re: Questions about SEN patch submissions
Date Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:34:20 GMT
Mark, has there been any change to the LGPL dependency?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Mark Bennett <> wrote:

> As some of you may recall I've been working on getting the SEN Japanese
> morphological analyzer working with 2.9.  (and also with Solr 1.4, but
> that's not for this list)
> I'm getting close to having a patch for JIRA.  However, a couple items:
> 1: The code is not currently hosted on Apache (it's over on the old sun
> area).  The author is fine with having it moved over to ASF.
>    But generally a "patch" implies a change to existing files, whereas I'll
> be adding a new area.  (org.apache.lucene.analysis.ja).
>    I think this will still work.
> 2: I was thinking it would be better to submit the original code "as is" in
> one JIRA patch, and then my changes in a second JIRA (per the Wiki's
> advice)
>    Wondering if y'all agree?  But wait....
> 3: The original code will NOT compile at all "as is".  (visibility issues,
> and source code has 16 bit literals not in in UTF-8)
>    I've got fixes for all of this, but submitting the original code "as is"
> where it won't even be accepted argued for a SINGLE PATCH
>    in this case, which would have the original plus my minimal changes.
> 4: When generating the patch, I'm not clear what the top level directory
> would be?
>    I think the path names would start with "org.apache.lucene...." etc.
>    But wanted to double check.
> 5: From previous emails, I think this is the correct list for this (vs
> dev?)  If not I can repost.
> Thanks,
> Mark
> --
> Mark Bennett / New Idea Engineering, Inc. /
> Direct: 408-733-0387 / Main: 866-IDEA-ENG / Cell: 408-829-6513

Robert Muir

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message