lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Is Lucene a good choice for PB scale mailbox search?
Date Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:20:08 GMT
For what it's worth, AOL uses a Solr cluster to handle searches for @aol users.  Each user
has his own index.

Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR



----- Original Message ----
> From: fulin tang <tangfulin@gmail.com>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, November 23, 2009 9:35:57 PM
> Subject: Is Lucene a good choice for PB scale mailbox search?
> 
> We are going to add full-text search for our mailbox service .
> 
> The problem is we have more than 1 PB mails there , and obviously we
> don't want to add another PB storage for search service , so we hope
> the index data will be small enough for storage while the search keeps
> fast .
> 
> The lucky is that every user just search with mails of their own , so
> we can split the data into a lot of indexes instead of keeping them in
> a big one .
> 
> So, after all these concerns ,  the question is , is lucene a good
> choice for this ? or which is the right way to do this ? Does anyone
> have done this  before ?
> 
> All opinions and comments are welcome !
> 
> fulin
> 
> 
> -- 
> 梦的开始挣扎于城市的边缘
> 心的远方执着在脚步的瞬间
> 我的宿命埋藏了寂寞的永远
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message