lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jake Mannix <>
Subject Re: share some numbers for range queries
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:48:40 GMT
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Uwe Schindler <> wrote:

> the second approach is slower, when deleted docs
> are involved and 0 is inside the range (need to consult TermDocs).

This is a good point (and should be mentioned in your blog, John) - for
custom FieldCache-like implementations (ie bobo-browse, which additionally
restricted to single-valued fields) need not have this deficiency, for they
can choose to map
empty values to MAX_INT or something like that, the FCRF in its raw form
can really bite you, performance-wise, if you didn't notice that sometimes
your queries ran across zero and there were lots of deletes.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message