Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peterlkeegan@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.222.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=eJgp1XDx7y44taABCY4CaJ7xiMrN8kwlRtFbiENcl7J/+XBsRCuWeU+jZK5mJPU5y0
         ul4vE+5jLZ7jyLywu0w45+76XG1r+47cr350lTtGxRQl2H0/AUn/PooSaYwVKTH4X411
         xjiqw8f13UMnhgcKnfHYu4WlB/z/7fqjIqTDA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9ac0c6aa0910250547o4d87432at29bc72c928f40797@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e994873a0910241420o39422fc7p4318d821ddef8a90@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e994873a0910241421g65e9a429y8a2b42e4b8819e90@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9ac0c6aa0910250547o4d87432at29bc72c928f40797@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:35:49 -0400
Message-ID: <e994873a0910251635m75b3c84eidf0ca9b098b96e76@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IO exception during merge/optimize
From: Peter Keegan <peterlkeegan@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd21410b454dd0476cae715

--000e0cd21410b454dd0476cae715
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>Did you get any traceback printed at all?
no, only what I reported.

>Did you see any BG thread exceptions on wherever your System.err is
directed to?
The jvm was running as a windows service, so output to System.err may have
gone to the bit bucket.
That's an interesting point, though.

Peter


On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> Hmm... Lucene tries to catch the original cause (from the BG thread
> doing the merge) and forward it to the main thread waiting for
> optimize to complete.
>
> Did you get any traceback printed at all?  It should include one
> traceback into Lucene's optimized method, and then another (under
> "caused by") showing the exception from the BG merge thread.
>
> Did you see any BG thread exceptions on wherever your System.err is
> directed to?
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Peter Keegan <peterlkeegan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > btw, this is with Lucene 2.9
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Peter Keegan <peterlkeegan@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sometimes seeing the following exception from an operation that does
> a
> >> merge and optimize:
> >>  java.io.IOException: background merge hit exception: _0:C1082866 _1:C79
> >> into _2 [optimize] [mergeDocStores]
> >> I'm pretty sure that it's caused by a temporary low disk space
> condition,
> >> but I'd like to be able to confirm this. It would be nice to have the
> java
> >> exception included in the Lucene exception. Any way to get this?
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

--000e0cd21410b454dd0476cae715--