Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70689 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2009 12:45:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2009 12:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 48301 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2009 12:45:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48226 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2009 12:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48216 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2009 12:45:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rff.rff@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.226] (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:45:43 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so2854692ewy.5 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:45:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Dyy/9yCtKQhJ+UGxQVtLPzoluvGn8TlCaA1etQIeDKw=; b=kFpJilGEPgY44kkMq/CBEilIwwyYBQtWOB+LsHm7c8q32sejpsz8iwvsdf7lOzbF4v 31nGLV4viICAG0OzWjr2C7sRlhFNm3oyrYxkNE1598m9I1aJLRgm/+1AeI0W9I+d92vi oGTbS6dYN9TzaZ76rrQGzPXfkpOe0MBZ81xWE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=uadEeQ/bJSX6ZZR4FIpE+4DviKVCqiF/BAWB/Hex4timMeg3ykduG0BkNu85kia9Fp xl//ClR/5aNyv4rL0IiHZX1LFtJJZi3xL5xj/vdXbvdqOzWdrOnOiSkyB17EUdxxdeee f2mjfhqJ1aQTltAMT60l37Kl1aDKHWckiBSIg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.132 with SMTP id u4mr952542wee.191.1255783522222; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:45:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2EDB8058-09B4-44A1-906C-55BE34A33B52@apache.org> References: <4AD84400.5050802@sirma.bg> <2EDB8058-09B4-44A1-906C-55BE34A33B52@apache.org> From: gabriele renzi Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:45:02 +0200 Message-ID: <828083e70910170545s33c42761g2c828cb4d3e7b471@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: is Lucene 3.0 coming soon? To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Oct 16, 2009, at 6:05 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> I would recommend to adopt your app to 2.9 and enable deprecation >> warnings. >> As soon as all deprecation warning disappear during compile, you are able >> to >> just go to 3.0 (just drop in jars when available). This is why we have >> 2.9. >> 2.9: it is just 3.0 with the deprecations not yet removed. No other >> changes >> extensions to the API. > > That and we are moving to Java 1.5. I've been wondering about this for a while: why 1.5? 1.6 has been out for three years, is it just that the additional advantages of it (pluggable annotations is the only thing I can think of) are not enough to break compat more? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org