lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Wang <john.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Realtime search best practices
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:10:15 GMT
I think it was my email Yonik responded to and he is right, I was being lazy
and didn't read the javadoc very carefully.My bad.
Thanks for the javadoc change.

-John

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@lucidimagination.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >  It may be surprising, but in fact I have read that
> > javadoc.
>
> It was not your email I responded to.
>
> >  It talks about not needing to close the
> > writer, but doesn't specifically talk about the what
> > the relationship between commit() calls and
> > getReader() calls is.
>
> Do you have a suggestion of how to update the JavaDoc?
> I'm not sure I understand the relationship between commit and
> getReader that you refer to.
>
> > , but why
> > is it so obvious that what could be happening
> > is that it only "returns all changes since the last
> > commit, but without touching disk because it
> > has docs in memory as well"?
>
> Sorry, this seems confusing - I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
> Perhaps we should approach this as proposed javadoc changes?
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message