lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Toke Eskildsen>
Subject Re: Maximum index file size
Date Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:33:40 GMT
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 08:49 +0200, Jake Mannix wrote:
>   One of the big problems you'll run into with this index size is that
> you'll never have enough RAM to give your OS's IO cache enough room to keep
> much of this index in memory, so you're going to be seeking in this monster
> file a lot. [...]

Solid State Drives helps a lot in this aspect. We've done experiments
with a 40GB index and adjustments of the amount of RAM available for
file cache. We observed that search-speed using SSD's weren't near as
susceptible to cache-size as conventional harddisks.

Some quick and fairly unstructured notes on our observations:

> [...]
> This may be mitigated by using really fast disks, possibly, which is yet
> another reason why you'll need to do some performance profiling on a 
> variety of sizes with similar-to-production data sets.

For our setup, a switch from conventional harddisks to SSDs moved the
bottleneck from I/O to CPU/RAM.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message