lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Konstantyn Smirnov <inject...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Performance diffs between filter.bits() and searcher.docFreq()
Date Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:27:31 GMT


hossman wrote:
> 
> "the second", and "no"
> 
Thanks for that. 

Concerning the *theoretical* performance difference, for the mid-size index,
what will it be in % roughly?

Are there any way to make indexReader.docFreqs() reflect the changes faster,
i.e. without the need to optimize()?

-----
Konstantyn Smirnov, CTO 
http://www.poiradar.ru www.poiradar.ru 
http://www.poiradar.com.ua www.poiradar.com.ua 
http://www.poiradar.com www.poiradar.com 
http://www.poiradar.de www.poiradar.de 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-diffs-between-filter.bits%28%29-and-searcher.docFreq%28%29-tp25186776p25253535.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message