Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil123@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=t6Dazbx7lwmkz+Utlcb9YyeayB1fkZxpyQsj3lC1KhwCbLNeoFAA1m8V9v7T10oa5x
         kLkY8R8hYuhph9W7GL/Mmm/RgVJVPB3rEIZjE8EVhbjbcOEHkgTNgah6bgaGp2rvmCxL
         gop2wjd9lgTEhBj6Nzgmx4CnxvdMqF7C9T/TE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090806160347.OP4RU.42535.imail@eastrmwml33>
References: <20090806160347.OP4RU.42535.imail@eastrmwml33>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:09:27 -0700
Message-ID: <9cafbc680908061609s61e5e52ake4723d1e0fb29425@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why does this search succeed with web app, but not Luke?
From: Phil Whelan <phil123@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jim,

Are you using the same Analyzer for indexing and searching? xxxx.yyy
will be seem as a HOSTNAME by StandardAnalyzer and will keep it as one
term, whereas another indexer might split this into 2 terms. This
should not matter either way as long as you are using the same
Analyzer for both indexing and searching.

I would expect this to pass unless you are using NOT_ANALYZED, or the
WhitespaceAnalyzer, or something else that would not split on "/".
    path:xxxx.yyy

In Luke, do you see 2 terms "xxxx" and "yyy", or just "xxxx.yyy", or
something else?

Thanks,
Phil

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, <ohaya@cox.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my indexer app (based on the IndexFiles.java demo), I am adding the "p=
ath" field:
>
> =A0 =A0doc.add(new Field("path", f.getPath(), Field.Store.YES, Field.Inde=
x.ANALYZED));
>
> Per Luke, the full path (e.g., "c:\....\xxxx.yyy") gets parsed, and one o=
f the terms (again, per Luke) is "xxxx", i.e., the actual file name, but wi=
thout the extension.
>
> Then, when I search with Luke for "path:xxxx", that succeeds, as expected=
, and when I search with Luke for "path:xxxx.yyy", that fails, as expected.
>
> But, if I search using the demo web app, for "path:xxxx.yyy", it succeeds=
.
>
> Since the Luke search for "path:xxxx.yyy" fails, I don't understand why t=
he web app search for "path:xxxx.yyy" would succeed?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org