lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anshum <ansh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene Vs Sphinx benchmarking for large dataset
Date Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:23:52 GMT
Thanks Simon! :)
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri Labs!
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com

The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
distinction is yours to draw............


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Anshum<anshumg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey Simon,
> > Thanks for the comment, though would be great to have the comment @ the
> > blog! :)
> done!
>
> Simon
> > About testing vanilla sphinx Vs Sphinx, have that pipelined but would be
> > some time before I go ahead and do that.
> > I'm also planning a benchmarking (of search & indexing) of 2.4 & 2.9
> (when
> > its here) with the most recent version of sphinx (and other search
> engines).
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > Naukri Labs!
> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >
> > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> > distinction is yours to draw............
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Simon Willnauer <
> > simon.willnauer@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Anshum, thanks for posting this on the list. I have a view comments on
> >> that benchmark while being happy that lucene has an upper hand in
> >> yours.
> >> I wonder if you can publish the various modifications you did to
> >> either of those? If not would it be possible to run the benchmarks
> >> against the vanilla versions? Did you use an already released version
> >> of lucene or did you do modifications against the trunk? I found it
> >> little hard to read - putting it into a table would make little more
> >> sense to me though. I personally would be interested in what kind of
> >> analysis you have applied to the index document and the queries
> >> though.
> >>
> >> simon
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Anshum<anshumg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with
> a
> >> > little modified version of sphinx :)
> >> > Have posted my results here
> >> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >> > Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Anshum Gupta
> >> > Naukri Labs!
> >> > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
> >> >
> >> > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
> >> > distinction is yours to draw............
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message