Return-Path: 
 <java-user-return-40746-apmail-lucene-java-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93762 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2009 15:23:42 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2009 15:23:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 72247 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2009 15:23:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72114 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2009 15:23:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:java-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:java-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72070 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2009 15:23:47 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:23:47 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [212.227.126.187] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de)
 (212.227.126.187)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:23:37 +0000
Received: from [172.20.41.160] (p5B207FBB.dip.t-dialin.net [91.32.127.187])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MKv5w-1MGE1l0Nzz-0001Bs; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:23:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4A366764.90802@intland.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:23:16 +0200
From: Zsolt Koppany <zkoppanylist@intland.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance
References: <4A365864.5080003@intland.com>
 <359a92830906150734u19123368v999b97d3a65ebad6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <359a92830906150734u19123368v999b97d3a65ebad6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+pHTywvPBLOya0SawZs9yfaOCeduH7hgcxcls
 MfDDHfC1OPSK2rlJIP3a57wB6tDL+gRPe9fh88GGVC7Z0UPKtD
 8Han1vijBgFDdaJwmyNQSpC7a3hNwDy
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Erick,

this a web application running 24 hours a day thus caching cannot be the 
reason. I get the same result after I re-start the same search.

Zsolt

Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, if you're seeing it, it's possible <G>....
> 
> But the first question is always "what were you measuring?" Be aware
> that when you open a searcher, the first few queries can fill caches, etc
> and
> may take an anomalously long time, especially if you're sorting. So could
> you give more details of your test setup?
> 
> Best
> Erick
> 
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Zsolt Koppany <zkoppanylist@intland.com>wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> on 99470 documents (I mean Lucene documents) a FuzzyQuery needs approx 30
>> seconds but PrefixQuery less than one.
>>
>> All Lucene files need 65MB together.
>>
>> I'm bit surprised of that. Is that possible?
>>
>> Zsolt
>>
>> Zsolt Koppany
>> Phone: +49-711-67400-679
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org