Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=n9bifE8afGfDTFCrC7ByRZ0X6TdeLUNSZWEEXo+LrR61svILgpifzIxVTFzkiUhQOZ
         3ZH/UdzzwMNbal6sSPMxPRDSjEAkCnAVgHiZgYKOYx4b51nZ7l4F+3hndMAgi9I+1OX7
         LyodyRrMB0PlzjpfO4dr5VuboGHiTsdE2wzqg=
Message-ID: <4A30FB8F.7010400@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:41:51 -0400
From: Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 Release
References: <4A300F60.1020207@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A300F60.1020207@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Okay, its only been a short time and we have already whittled the list 
down from 56 to 42. I think we have covered most of the easy calls. If 
you know an issue your involved in won't likely be done soon, please 
help us out and take off the version or push it to 3.1.

Next time I go through, I'm going to concentrate on pushing back on 
those issues that have yet to find an assignee. Please assign yourself 
if you plan on fishing an unassigned issue off for 2.9.

Ill wait a few days at least.

- Mark


Mark Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> So... how about we try to wrap up 2.9/3.0 and ship with what we have,
>> now? It's been 8 months since 2.4.0 was released, and 2.9's got plenty
>> of new stuff, and we are all itching to remove these deprecated APIs,
>> switch to Java 1.5, etc.
>>
>> We should try to finish the issues that are open and underway... but I
>> think many of the issues marked 2.9 now, especially those not even
>> started, should not in fact block 2.9.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>
> We would all, I think, like Lucene 2.9 to release soon.
>
> Unfortunately, there are 56 open issues assigned to 2.9. They won't 
> all likely make it.
>
> We have got to start pruning down the list.
>
> If you are not going to be able to get to / finish an issue in a very 
> near time frame, could you help us all out and move the issue to 3.0?
>
> Trying to finish any issues that are close would also be great 
> obviously, but as a beginning, if we could just get a better handle 
> (eg less issues to consider)
> on what we have to finish off, that would be great.
>
> I'm going to go though a bit and see if their are any obvious 
> candidates to push off soon.
>
> I suppose, if there is something that you really want to be sure is in 
> 2.9, and its not likely to be finished shortly, you should probably 
> speak up too.
>


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org