lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zsolt Koppany <zkoppanyl...@intland.com>
Subject Re: Fuzzy vs Prefix query Performance
Date Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:23:16 GMT
Erick,

this a web application running 24 hours a day thus caching cannot be the 
reason. I get the same result after I re-start the same search.

Zsolt

Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, if you're seeing it, it's possible <G>....
> 
> But the first question is always "what were you measuring?" Be aware
> that when you open a searcher, the first few queries can fill caches, etc
> and
> may take an anomalously long time, especially if you're sorting. So could
> you give more details of your test setup?
> 
> Best
> Erick
> 
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Zsolt Koppany <zkoppanylist@intland.com>wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> on 99470 documents (I mean Lucene documents) a FuzzyQuery needs approx 30
>> seconds but PrefixQuery less than one.
>>
>> All Lucene files need 65MB together.
>>
>> I'm bit surprised of that. Is that possible?
>>
>> Zsolt
>>
>> Zsolt Koppany
>> Phone: +49-711-67400-679
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message