Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52445 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2009 00:07:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 2009 00:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 93578 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2009 00:07:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 93492 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2009 00:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 93482 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2009 00:07:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:07:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of john.wang@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.241 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.241] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.241) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:07:15 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so125154ana.5 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2NgWz9itFYQrhjumpzU3g7GqZe77dZl+rLjyrYjccDQ=; b=LO+5VXkAZLlyNmiVmq7LhvHR33Q9wFIoAVW0ffmYyrKwVoCe+/7nzveHCgewswN5S0 U+RsHZhc72dEpBzeN2qsXL1iHOGot9FV0JedFE0OwKVZaYpDC8cHIczLUJDU2LwRX5J0 m6FV41BeK/8sj9aJ04irwMoc4lNZ0UuJOmoi8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uIzW1EE/NVfvUHgaDrr0NPRPkMerD4fAG9qBb86gl+HYQAgLc34R/dMsHMADOTSF8D dzsYMgSg+bQkl8SwMHiYgOK8vyX21MCihSVFXaQOHB+Hs4u7pnRvHq9oOE+0zki2yTL5 FZGTo5faro1+wP+oLTjBPZYF+RUIXXi2njcyU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.229.12 with SMTP id b12mr1939291anh.26.1240186014709; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <43b459c10903180905s9e5063fo2397cbcfaef5f744@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:06:54 -0700 Message-ID: <8837fb770904191706j7b3190eald00cd10eeb6031c9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: LocalLucene/Lucene Spatial From: John Wang To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163691fe62dcb77d0467f14e4a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163691fe62dcb77d0467f14e4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there a reason the Query build is from a bitset via a ConstantScoreQuery instead a RangeQuery? Seems we would be paying a penalty for loading the bitset, esp the bitset would be rather sparse. Furthermore, is TrieRangeQuery planning to be somehow used in the spatial package? Thanks -John On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > In the trunk, see contrib/spatial. I believe it is all committed and being > worked on by interested contributors: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/contrib/spatial/ > > -Grant > > > On Mar 18, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > > I am working on a project that is already using Lucene (through Hibernate >> Search) to perform full text queries and have since come across several >> sites with information about LocalLucene/Lucene Spatial. I was wondering >> if >> there was a timeline for having this work implemented that anyone was >> aware >> of? >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > --00163691fe62dcb77d0467f14e4a--