Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78006 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2009 20:30:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2009 20:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 34058 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2009 20:30:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34020 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2009 20:30:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34009 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2009 20:30:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:30:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shashi.mit@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.30] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:29:58 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1001955yxb.5 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:29:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ro7/Ox3wCXV4qJiy9xh0+A6R7kaJMwAOR1csKWSR+uk=; b=KGKzQSMVuVjc5i7jA14bHzbaOO81d/8QbWl7mD4M5pSToc2aRTUjoHGaE/rl/VRVdx fpQ9K02W8pAeABw/PYxyCj5xMSprrfxKc+GvpEZbDsxmIJkAiENQvcFX+b9BrYdFqomn kxphLymV/GUDzn8LkJadgsH+M4VeDRb9pK+4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=sk4jwSWXEu18JHlmsS0ETdbUSXVozQntwgfFiQP6bhYjrYwG0XZrAhw1mAjVjSwsRG NOhC+goiXNael18Rtz7W/r+CO+b5O3U3vxGmyFabjJwKvszpEPi6PjtLRW8KmS25yrJR rqLcTrDtsLcUivDjCZuKJ6TWc3rcuvOTIt8oU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: shashi.mit@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.112.10 with SMTP id p10mr7631339ybm.234.1237667377771; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:29:37 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2f9b5b450e04ff6d Message-ID: <4d19a3630903211329g54054b26gee021ad79d47e21@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Index Partitioning From: Shashi Kant To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517573d4666f4220465a6e4b8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517573d4666f4220465a6e4b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there an "elegant" approach to partitioning a large Lucene index (~1TB) into smaller sub-indexes other than the obvious method of re-indexing into partitions? Any ideas? Thanks, Shashi --001517573d4666f4220465a6e4b8--