Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=oI8LWB1Fjg0p8heRZTPgAPI6rb0zOHHHlZXcUXe6x3PF0dhCgN2P4b5v4hMT/CDpJ+
         wqWBY9I9axRapIF8gjdMPzF/L/6PF6PuRE5Uf6u2Ct9RsyWq8KyeTi15MZYSUvbMiLiq
         pX7/idKPNJ22nqyg8yCDOxXHrfKbqFQUX1w+0=
Message-ID: <359a92830901161600h4e31e3d7j4e3362af8502c54a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:00:41 -0500
From: "Erick Erickson" <erickerickson@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search Across All Fields
In-Reply-To: <497111F8.7020409@stimulussoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_38_27732658.1232150442030"
References: <49710068.1090808@gmail.com>
	 <3994E409-BFF0-4348-9D84-4C762B150641@gmail.com>
	 <497111F8.7020409@stimulussoft.com>

------=_Part_38_27732658.1232150442030
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I think you forgot a set of parentheses, a close paren right before
the AND and an open paren right after AND

Depending upon how big your index is, a MUCH easier way to do
this is to index another field, call it all_text say, and add all your
terms to that field as well as to the individual one, then search your
all_text field instead....

Best
Erick

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Jamie <jamie@stimulussoft.com> wrote:

> Hi Everyone
>
> I have two queries:
>
> Query 1
> ======
>
> (attachments:"beauty supply") AND sentdate:[d20081117010000 TO
> d20090117235900]
>
> Query 2
> ======
>
> (priority:beauty attach:beauty score:beauty size:beauty sentdate:beauty
> archivedate:beauty receiveddate:beauty from:beauty to:beauty subject:beauty
> cc:beauty bcc:beauty deliveredto:beauty flag:beauty sensitivity:beauty
> sender:beauty recipient:beauty body:beauty attachments:beauty
> attachname:beauty AND priority:supply attach:supply score:supply size:supply
> sentdate:supply archivedate:supply receiveddate:supply from:supply to:supply
> subject:supply cc:supply bcc:supply deliveredto:supply flag:supply
> sensitivity:supply sender:supply recipient:supply body:supply
> attachments:supply attachname:supply) AND sentdate:[d20081117010000 TO
> d20090117235900]
>
> Query 1 returns 138 results, while Query 2 return 0 result. Any idea why?
> The second query is meant to offer the search across all fields, whereas the
> first query specifies one field. Is there a better way to conduct a search
> across all fields? Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help!
>
> Regards,
>
> Jamie
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

------=_Part_38_27732658.1232150442030--