Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2574 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2008 11:00:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2008 11:00:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 38485 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2008 11:00:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 38452 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2008 11:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 38441 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2008 11:00:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:00:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:59:59 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LEiVe-0004Yb-LE for java-user@lucene.apache.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:59:38 -0800 Message-ID: <21125964.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:59:38 -0800 (PST) From: "Matthias W." To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene SpellChecker returns no suggetions after changing Server In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: Matthias.Wangler@e-projecta.com References: <20910159.post@talk.nabble.com> <21015278.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for your answer. I already found the reason for the bad performance. hossman wrote: > > don't construct a new LuceneDictionary/IndexReader on every "suggest" call > ... construct them once, and reuse them for each suggestion. > This was the first thing I did, but the effect was not that big... The reason was the usage of the RAMDirectory. Now I'm usig FSDirectory.getDirectory("/dictionary") instead of new RAMDirectory() and it works fine. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-SpellChecker-returns-no-suggetions-after-changing-Server-tp20910159p21125964.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org