Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60751 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2008 21:36:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2008 21:36:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 75444 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2008 21:36:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75419 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2008 21:36:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75408 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2008 21:36:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:36:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.156] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.156) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:35:37 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so1214398fgb.27 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=PDPDUKHL4IK0m97LeXse/lFdnFoTMWylkO+bPu+xx9U=; b=seyO+kPMHBQInXwgSssYzh7KUVBmmI7t/aWoKs6eHispGZtGKUUTrgekQW3IFPmjr6 9eW00E41r+2e8HDkw1favInY1R9wCd0hoTTPUZkLvJ474x7J0GLGoA9S75daK351UiQL qXeComGg5Pv38oxKGVLaVWiMReiOBQn0HOMk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=B0ejrJm4ICY2WIgkMDNVGJCqnRNQ5xlgzHcuMP57HQwgOvS1+6FOTYZdbr/wgBUUtr kMhQAzmzOSPpdKOKYcK9Z8KDP9TkToc7qqU/UBYEWLNVz82+/3VIzulCwr9gHwozlhpJ sS0V9pT71YjYAvIkMXeLUXK+v9NP6lrMI4h5E= Received: by 10.187.183.7 with SMTP id k7mr843812fap.43.1226093778537; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.187.190.19 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4fe4c4f50811071336h4e4ecffaqccb7c3efb64d8bb8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:36:18 -0700 From: ChadDavis To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Store versus Index MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_46807_22783495.1226093778529" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_46807_22783495.1226093778529 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I just need a little confirmation of my understanding here. If i say that a field is to be stored, the entire thing is written to the index. It might also be indexed in a tokenized fasion if i also specify that. What are the advantages to storing a field then? So you can search for that field? Just so you can retrieve that field's value when you get a hit on the document via another field? Also along thes lines, if i don't "store" a field, can I still do my search based upon that field? ------=_Part_46807_22783495.1226093778529--