lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Greg Shackles" <>
Subject Re: Lucene implementation/performance question
Date Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:04:07 GMT
Thanks for the update, Mark.  I guess that means I'll have to do the sorting
myself - that shouldn't be too hard, but the annoying part would just be
knowing where one result ends and the next begins since there's no guarantee
that they'll always be the same. Let me know if you find any information on
the discussion about it.

- Greg

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Mark Miller <> wrote:

> Yeah, discussion came up on order and I believe we punted - its up to you
> to track order and sort at the moment. I think that was to prevent those
> that didnt need it from paying the sort cost, but I have to go find that
> discussion again (maybe its in the issue?) I'll look at the whole idea again
> though.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message