Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <48CF8595.402@boboco.ie>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:08:21 +0200
From: Eric Bowman <ebowman@boboco.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Some SSD results to share
References: <48CF7721.1050005@boboco.ie>
 <BC214406-D1D4-437C-90F9-C0BD2AFFE957@mikemccandless.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC214406-D1D4-437C-90F9-C0BD2AFFE957@mikemccandless.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> I'd be curious how much of a performance difference you see between 
> the different SSD drives.
>
> This test was with OCZ "Core Series" but previous tests were with 
> different SSDs right?
>
> EG Intel just released a new 80 GB SSD (X25-M) which is getting rave 
> reviews, even compared to the OCZ "core series" which seemed to be the 
> previous favorite:
>
> http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403
>

We wanted the Intel, but we couldn't get our hands on one. I too would 
be very interested to compare the results, if anyone wants to donate one. :)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org