lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Pre-filtering for expensive query
Date Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:00:29 GMT

On Aug 30, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:

> Matt Ronge wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am working on implementing a new Query, Weight and Scorer that is  
>> expensive to run. I'd like to limit the number of documents I run  
>> this query on by first building a candidate set of documents with a  
>> boolean query. Once I have that candidate set, I was hoping I could  
>> build a filter off of it, and issue that along with my expensive  
>> query. However, after reading the code I see that filtering is done  
>> during the search, and not before hand. So my initial boolean query  
>> won't help in limiting the number of documents scored by my  
>> expensive query.
>> Has anyone done any work into restricting the set of docs that a  
>> query operates on?
>> Or should I just implement something myself in a custom scorer?
>
> I think you can use a FilteredQuery in a BooleanClause. This may be  
> faster than the filtering code in the Searcher, because the  
> evaluation is done during scoring and not afterwards. FilteredQuery  
> internally makes


FYI, not sure if this is exactly what you are talking about Andrzej,  
but IndexSearcher no longer filters after scoring.  This was changed  
in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message