Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
  b=ZYlWMdii2XIe0nrzvDRjHs7R45v+w+5fqIJ/brwwqBTkGnADW7q/skuMmJ49ZQ/ZQsqDoKK2EhQ88TG7kDPikTm/55GGtzD9WNZ5G5TZRzxULwjTMwrl793CnJV5bBaAw49EdpPtGcqMixejyX5Krjl5KeZh+oqKh9ZB7KvSDQA=;
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <761271.80262.qm@web50301.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

Andre,

Check the Lucene FAQ, there is an entry about wildcards and analysis (which doesn't take place for wildcard queries).  Could that be it?

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch


----- Original Message ----
> From: Andre Rubin <andre.rubin@gmail.com>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:30:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
> 
> My searches for my String tokenized field was working properly. I
> switched the field to un_tokenized, rebuilt the index, and now my
> searches only return strings that match the query string in lower
> case.
> 
> For example, searching for 'us*':
> 
> The tokenized field version would find 'USA' and 'usa'
> 
> The untokenized field version only finds 'usa'
> 
> I'm using the StandardAnalyzer in both cases.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> Andre
> 
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Perhaps you can give some examples.  Yes, untokenized means "full string" - it 
> requires an "exact match".
> >
> > Otis
> > --
> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Andre Rubin 
> >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2008 8:04:04 PM
> >> Subject: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> When I switched a String field from tokenized to untokenized, some
> >> searches started not returning some obvious values. Am I missing
> >> something on querying untokenized fields? Another question is, do I
> >> need an Analyzer if my search is on an Untokenized field, wouldn't the
> >> search be based on the full String rather than its tokens?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> Andre
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org