Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31248 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2008 14:23:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2008 14:23:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 23643 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2008 14:23:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23612 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2008 14:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23601 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2008 14:23:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:23:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.239 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.239] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:22:04 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c30so1605176wra.21 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UB79pv2FRWWGwSorMmM/wrwn9YciZgYQ2dni8XkFwwA=; b=urJ9BZKkEBOR8+XMXTNhuNhZr0a/QEurNagLqkirf6s6zOh0i/JziGXmn03Rhn5BOG YCjAYnM8lVz7eMcMysPT4UiosI0qywoOqVI+jxbeujXfuj9siuSBd/WR7pnlM5Xls9gq khWecGZoIrgkOV/5FyYJjM7vk4OBsqgBekyjA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PU2oftpcWamIZ9stSmzc7bCXzsK5/0vUUs2z5+1dqYlRz03UBX2H7bib3ObvdsMKJR 6Icd8daQgEvby4wkZSXVNMVh576NUPhjcoi/xnzcl+Rc2Bdye80OXKc2AjJzvoKP0RQ7 oPRrvM5ivFM8fiZDThzNuEbcdGvHRQ5UJTDh0= Received: by 10.90.93.13 with SMTP id q13mr5243430agb.106.1218896535565; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.105? ( [69.124.234.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm5378741agb.12.2008.08.16.07.22.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48A6E295.5050400@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:22:13 -0400 From: Mark Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: windows file system cache References: <36B4EF9511887240A973A93E7878B0560A0B11ED51@US1-IIEX1.IICORP.DOM> In-Reply-To: <36B4EF9511887240A973A93E7878B0560A0B11ED51@US1-IIEX1.IICORP.DOM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Robert Stewart wrote: > Anyone else run on Windows? We have index around 26 GB in size. Seems file system cache ends up taking up nearly all available RAM (26 GB out of 32 GB on 64-bit box). Lucene process is around 5 GB, so very little left over for queries, etc, and box starts swapping during searches. I think changing file system cache size setting is needed. Anyone else have same issue? > > Hmmm...get more ram :) Windows 64-bit upped the default file system cache size from 1 gig to 1 terabyte. Your feeling the awesome effects of that upgrade I think. There is an API call ( SetSystemFilecache() ) to override this - so perhaps code up a C app to set it before running your Lucene app? - Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org