lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:16:48 GMT
Hi,

Perhaps you can give some examples.  Yes, untokenized means "full string" - it requires an
"exact match".

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch



----- Original Message ----
> From: Andre Rubin <andre.rubin@gmail.com>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2008 8:04:04 PM
> Subject: Searching Tokenized x Un_tokenized
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> When I switched a String field from tokenized to untokenized, some
> searches started not returning some obvious values. Am I missing
> something on querying untokenized fields? Another question is, do I
> need an Analyzer if my search is on an Untokenized field, wouldn't the
> search be based on the full String rather than its tokens?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Andre
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message