Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43038 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2008 10:21:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2008 10:21:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 66743 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 10:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66695 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 10:21:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66684 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2008 10:21:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:21:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.233.184.233] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:20:46 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c30so2241440wra.21 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.249.10 with SMTP id w10mr118824anh.156.1216894869481; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.17.4.4? ( [72.93.214.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b29sm13079251ana.22.2008.07.24.03.21.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4384CE1E-2111-4FCB-9938-4F6E1E866009@mikemccandless.com> From: Michael McCandless To: java-user@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1bcb7c7f0807231207y22305c8bhdf53cd4624edd90f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: lucene delete by query Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:21:08 -0400 References: <1bcb7c7f0807230653u541284e5m5f015c71fb0961c9@mail.gmail.com> <1bcb7c7f0807231207y22305c8bhdf53cd4624edd90f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Unfortunately, this is not an easy question to answer ... it's really up to you to test it out for your application & production env, and see. We certainly try very hard not to break things, but alot of sizable changes have gone into the trunk since 2.3. Lucene has good test case coverage, and that coverage keeps improving with time -- every time we find something broken we make a test case first to catch it & prevent it in the future, then fix it. If you do test the trunk it'd be great to hear back how it went, good or bad, because that helps us improve, faster... Mike Cam Bazz wrote: > how reliable is the version in the trunk? is it ok for production? > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Yonik Seeley > wrote: > >> It's in the lucene trunk (current development version). >> IndexWriter.deleteDocuments(Query query) >> >> -Yonik >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Cam Bazz wrote: >>> hello, >>> >>> was not there a lucene delete by query feature coming up? I remember >>> something like that, but I could not find an references. >>> >>> best regards, >>> -c.b. >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org