Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20547 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2008 14:01:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jun 2008 14:01:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 68338 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2008 14:01:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 68300 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2008 14:01:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 68289 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2008 14:01:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:01:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.186] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.170.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:00:21 +0000 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so691186rne.4 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=gYTn4eyB0V5yG+QCJtMXDlmJCEekKlJCf4bwR5WKaGc=; b=aB3tfgGomkg9A/nu/8CoXx2aiSDC0j5qdfJqTcCHYuFUZpPs07R6XK6c1T6NLsDvk+ kDClS17bQddb67Us2C5yHTCHtpl68n/HcOmSZsy7nCa1gZMVW4UQEnkeZK+QeO5pdGEr BEdVtIsGbY+yz2yjkRPZ5kD+zslcIFBTbohrQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=js7UOZW2ip1gwZMum0HLjH/K/QwbxxVcAexD6UrDBPXQwTH1moyksd555EcLx0F+C2 dPwIh7Vr1GuDrGkPjCa7RYlQP9Y7DkXUVEkEBO2DtkkzU27On3/GmHbBYxCmqHmTXAtG N1FfGhACOiGeZVJ5z3pVAZXzcaypFbZkVp6Ac= Received: by 10.142.177.5 with SMTP id z5mr6823210wfe.248.1214402439212; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.201.6 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <359a92830806250700j5e98ce9dl959ca9416559d195@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:39 -0400 From: "Erick Erickson" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Different indices for different searches? In-Reply-To: <43882481-4ADB-4BF4-BF76-583112301E0D@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_24316_8519643.1214402439245" References: <43882481-4ADB-4BF4-BF76-583112301E0D@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_24316_8519643.1214402439245 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline It depends (tm, Erik Hatcher). How many docs in your index? How much information for each doc? What is the size of your index? You could have two different indexes. You could index the same data in different fields in the same index and only have one. There have been several discussions about this, try searching the archive for "more like this". Best Erick On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Sascha Fahl wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 kind of searches. One kind is like the wikipedia suggestions and > the other one is pretty classic. So does it make sense to have different > indices for this 2 search-styles? > > best, > sascha > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org > > ------=_Part_24316_8519643.1214402439245--