Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54297 invoked from network); 31 May 2008 12:25:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 May 2008 12:25:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 64937 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2008 12:25:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64895 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2008 12:25:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64884 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2008 12:25:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 May 2008 05:25:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luz290@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 May 2008 12:24:45 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so126420anc.49 for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 05:25:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=9h8KTCpaYS1MaPcFflsb1uVff6gjWMsrpNBcwBLdw9I=; b=P/Jrzk33ruDNI5ZJBV6ePIqxjeNXd6Ai1ulB+ObUPPKC0rEUtX8ISVysxwqjcDv1KvgH622rZcqZXxD0GQ9rDvfFBvKQWjXoquLq9VgaRp3hLhSCUxQn2AOwRkPabmIqh8vxrNo7Z+AN/LFHXn/SeugxDwkebiOHAtPMQ/D0qmA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=w1kZAsqItqofeymxj3mM77dFMbDdVwAOVv6tpczuwp97eL1MtqDbmGz2QPoXRa6ZUjuJcS8cejo6iwJ74u8kyBGJjT4QtQvI4Emr7rlOL03Govfy2wTRgSUKRAS6u8KQi5PIIhcoiEu3yYYsCw4091TieCm4L0B3ijG+CTlJmC4= Received: by 10.100.14.2 with SMTP id 2mr11133102ann.37.1212236701765; Sat, 31 May 2008 05:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.132.15 with HTTP; Sat, 31 May 2008 05:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:25:01 -0400 From: "lucene user" To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Lucene search time in real production use? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_38_12408804.1212236701759" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_38_12408804.1212236701759 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Folks: What are some average search and retrieval times for Lucene queries in real production use? Would people include relevant stuff like the number of documents in your index, etc.? Thanks for your help! ------=_Part_38_12408804.1212236701759--